Michael Saylor took to Twitter to assure investors that MicroStrategy’s balance sheet is well positioned to avoid a margin call in its bitcoin-backed loan.
- Michael Saylor said his company had anticipated potential bitcoin volatility and was ready to “HODL through adversity.”
- MicroStrategy took out a $205 million bitcoin-backed loan from Silvergate Bank in March 2022 and risks getting margin called if bitcoin falls below $21,000.
- Saylor previously tweeted that the company has 115,109 BTC along with other available assets to post as collateral to avoid liquidation.
MicroStrategy, a software analytics company and the largest bitcoin holding company, dominated the news on Tuesday due to its risk of getting margin called in its $205 million bitcoin-backed loan.
The company’s risk became apparent when bitcoin briefly fell below the lending margin call figure of $21,000 overnight. However, its CEO took to Twitter to assure investors that the company is in a good position to not have to sell its bitcoin.
“When MicroStrategy adopted a #Bitcoin strategy, it anticipated volatility and structured its balance sheet so it could continue to #HODL in adversity,” Saylor said. said.
Saylor tweeted a previous May 10 announcement that further detailed the terms of the loan as well as the company’s plan.
“MicroStrategy has a $205 million term loan and needs to keep $410 million as collateral. $MSTR [MicroStrategy] has 115,109 BTC that he can pledge,” Saylor explained. “If the price of #BTC falls below $3,562, the company may issue further guarantees.”
Silvergate Bank’s loan requires $410 million in collateral, which the company would miss if the price of bitcoin fell below $21,000 – forcing MicroStrategy to add additional collateral to maintain the terms of the loan.
As Saylor explained, MicroStrategy has enough bitcoin to post as collateral to fund the loan up to a BTC price of $3,562. Should bitcoin fall below this price, the company intends to further collateralize with other assets.
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.